[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKwvOd=tOURgAFUNQPX3DDqd-eAbZ9kMmyksXEUK-a2N_Gky1g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 15:49:17 -0800
From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, kvm <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v2 2/2] KVM: Pre-allocate 1 cpumask variable per
cpu for both pv tlb and pv ipis
On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 5:27 AM Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> On 26/02/20 14:10, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> > Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com> writes:
> >
> >> (putting Paolo in To: field, in case email filters are to blame.
> >> Vitaly, maybe you could ping Paolo internally?)
> >>
> >
> > I could, but the only difference from what I'm doing right now would
> > proabbly be the absence of non-@...aht.com emails in To/Cc: fields of
> > this email :-)
> >
> > Do we want this fix for one of the last 5.6 RCs or 5.7 would be fine?
> > Personally, I'd say we're not in a great hurry and 5.7 is OK.
>
> I think we can do it for 5.6, but we're not in a great hurry. :) The
> rc4 pull request was already going to be relatively large and I had just
> been scolded by Linus so I postponed this, but I am going to include it
> this week.
No rush; soak time is good.
--
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers
Powered by blists - more mailing lists