lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 26 Feb 2020 13:55:14 +0000
From:   Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
To:     Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
        Sharat Masetty <smasetty@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     devicetree@...r.kernel.org, dianders@...omium.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, dri-devel@...edesktop.org,
        freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org, will@...nel.org,
        iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: arm-smmu: update the list of clocks

[ /me fires off MAINTAINERS patch... ]

On 20/02/2020 9:02 pm, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 01:42:22PM +0530, Sharat Masetty wrote:
>> This patch adds a clock definition needed for powering on the GPU TBUs
>> and the GPU TCU.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sharat Masetty <smasetty@...eaurora.org>
>> ---
>>   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml | 3 +++
>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml
>> index 6515dbe..235c0df 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml
>> @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ properties:
>>             - enum:
>>                 - qcom,msm8996-smmu-v2
>>                 - qcom,msm8998-smmu-v2
>> +              - qcom,sc7180-smmu-v2
> 
> The addition of the compatible string isn't (directly) related with $subject,
> this should be done in a separate patch.

...or the patch should just be accurately described as "add support for 
new variant X, which requires an additional clock Y".

And speaking of which, can anyone clarify how "TCU and TBU core clock" 
manages to abbreviate to "mem_iface_clk"? I would have naively assumed 
something like "core" would be most logical.

Robin.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ