linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v14 00/10] Landlock LSM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 26 Feb 2020 16:34:59 +0100
From:   Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>
To:     J Freyensee <why2jjj.linux@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>, Jann Horn <jann@...jh.net>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
        Mickaël Salaün <mickael.salaun@....gouv.fr>,
        "Serge E . Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        Vincent Dagonneau <vincent.dagonneau@....gouv.fr>,
        kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v14 00/10] Landlock LSM


On 25/02/2020 19:49, J Freyensee wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2/24/20 8:02 AM, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
> 
>> ## Syscall
>>
>> Because it is only tested on x86_64, the syscall is only wired up for
>> this architecture.  The whole x86 family (and probably all the others)
>> will be supported in the next patch series.
> General question for u.  What is it meant "whole x86 family will be
> supported".  32-bit x86 will be supported?

Yes, I was referring to x86_32, x86_64 and x32, but all architectures
should be supported.