[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200226161602.GO37466@atomide.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 08:16:02 -0800
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To: Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>
Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com>,
Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
"H . Nikolaus Schaller" <hns@...delico.com>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>,
Ladislav Michl <ladis@...ux-mips.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clocksource: timer-ti-dm: Drop bogus
omap_dm_timer_of_set_source()
* Suman Anna <s-anna@...com> [200212 21:36]:
> Hi Tony,
>
> Do you have the history of why the 32 KHz source is set as parent during
> prepare? One of the current side-affects of this patch is that now instead
> of bailing out, the 32 KHz source is set, and consumers will still need
> to select their appropriate parent. Dropping that call should actually
> allow us to select the parents in the consumer nodes in dts files using
> the assigned-clocks and assigned-clock-parents properties. I prefer to
> drop it if you do not foresee any issues. For now, I do not anticipate
> any issues with omap-pwm-dmtimer with this patch.
Using the 32 KiHz source works better for PM. But yeah the
machine specific source clock should be configured with
assigned-clocks and assigned-clock-parents properites.
Things seem to behave just fine for me with this patch for both
pwm-leds and PM. Good to see this function gone:
Tested-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists