linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 14/18] x86: Replace setup_irq() by request

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200227142643.GA5610@afzalpc>
Date:   Thu, 27 Feb 2020 19:56:43 +0530
From:   afzal mohammed <afzal.mohd.ma@...il.com>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/18] x86: Replace setup_irq() by request_irq()

Hi Thomas,

On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 02:29:54PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:

> Using scripting to find the spots and automatically convert them to
> something which is functionally and semantically correct is perfectly
> fine. But scripts neither have taste nor common sense.
> 
> So going over a scripted conversion and fixing non-sensical stuff up
> manually is a good thing.

> The easy route is fine for the initial step. See above.

Sure, i will do the changes as per your suggestion.

Regards
afzal