[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200321174303.GA7930@afzalpc>
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2020 23:13:03 +0530
From: afzal mohammed <afzal.mohd.ma@...il.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org,
linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, linux-hexagon@...r.kernel.org,
linux-c6x-dev@...ux-c6x.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org, Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>,
Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@...6.fr>,
Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@...g.fr>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/18] genirq: Remove setup_irq()
Hi Thomas,
On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 04:37:13PM +0530, afzal mohammed wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 11:31:15AM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > Vs. merging this series, I suggest the following approach:
> >
> > - Resubmit the individual changes as single patches or small series
> > to the relevant maintainers and subsystem mailing lists. They have
> > no dependency on a core change and can be applied where they belong
> > to.
> >
> > - After 5.6-rc6, verify which parts have made their way into
> > linux-next and resubmit the ignored ones as a series to me along
> > with the removal of the core parts.
> >
> > That way we can avoid conflicting changes between subsystems and the tip
> > irq/core branch as much as possible.
>
> Okay, i will do accordingly.
i am on it, is delayed due to the reason as mentioned at,
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200321172626.GA6323@afzalpc
[ not repeating contents here since other mail was sent just now,
cc'ing you ]
Regards
afzal
Powered by blists - more mailing lists