[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <59586.1582782810@turing-police>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 00:53:30 -0500
From: "Valdis Klētnieks" <valdis.kletnieks@...edu>
To: "Kohada.Tetsuhiro@...MitsubishiElectric.co.jp"
<Kohada.Tetsuhiro@...MitsubishiElectric.co.jp>
Cc: "Mori.Takahiro@...MitsubishiElectric.co.jp"
<Mori.Takahiro@...MitsubishiElectric.co.jp>,
"Motai.Hirotaka@...MitsubishiElectric.co.jp"
<Motai.Hirotaka@...MitsubishiElectric.co.jp>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devel@...verdev.osuosl.org" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: exfat: remove symlink feature : Additional patch
On Thu, 27 Feb 2020 02:14:02 +0000, "Kohada.Tetsuhiro@...MitsubishiElectric.co.jp" said:
> Thanks for comment.
>
> > Then this should have been [PATCH v2], and the fixed version [PATCH
> > v3]
>
> 2nd patch(Additional patch) not include 1st patch(RFC PATCH).
> And the 1st patch has been merged into 'staging-next'.
> Now I can't decide.
> a) Add only version information to the 2nd patch.
> b) Merge the 1st and 2nd patches.
>
> Which is better for v3?
The first part is in-tree, so we don't re-visit it in this case. You want a
new patch that consists of *only* the second set of changes, and the changelog
for the changes for that patch.
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists