[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <TY1PR01MB1578C8F3D1A9F130C5844C6890EB0@TY1PR01MB1578.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 02:14:02 +0000
From: "Kohada.Tetsuhiro@...MitsubishiElectric.co.jp"
<Kohada.Tetsuhiro@...MitsubishiElectric.co.jp>
To: 'Valdis Klētnieks' <valdis.kletnieks@...edu>
CC: "Mori.Takahiro@...MitsubishiElectric.co.jp"
<Mori.Takahiro@...MitsubishiElectric.co.jp>,
"Motai.Hirotaka@...MitsubishiElectric.co.jp"
<Motai.Hirotaka@...MitsubishiElectric.co.jp>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devel@...verdev.osuosl.org" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] staging: exfat: remove symlink feature : Additional patch
Thanks for comment.
> Then this should have been [PATCH v2], and the fixed version [PATCH
> v3]
2nd patch(Additional patch) not include 1st patch(RFC PATCH).
And the 1st patch has been merged into 'staging-next'.
Now I can't decide.
a) Add only version information to the 2nd patch.
b) Merge the 1st and 2nd patches.
Which is better for v3?
--
Kohada Tetsuhiro <Kohada.Tetsuhiro@...MitsubishiElectric.co.jp>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists