[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdUZfR6pYG-hourZCKT-jhh1t+x-ySF4JnEPJjscGAQT+A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 14:36:29 +0100
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Marc Gonzalez <marc.w.gonzalez@...e.fr>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Rafael Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Suzuki Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 2/2] clk: Use devm_add in managed functions
Hi Marc,
Thanks for your patch!
On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 4:55 PM Marc Gonzalez <marc.w.gonzalez@...e.fr> wrote:
> Using the helper produces simpler code, and smaller object size.
> E.g. with gcc-arm-9.2-2019.12-x86_64-aarch64-none-linux-gnu:
>
> text data bss dec hex filename
> - 1708 80 0 1788 6fc drivers/clk/clk-devres.o
> + 1524 80 0 1604 644 drivers/clk/clk-devres.o
And the size reduction could have been even more ;-)
> Signed-off-by: Marc Gonzalez <marc.w.gonzalez@...e.fr>
> --- a/drivers/clk/clk-devres.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-devres.c
> @@ -55,25 +51,17 @@ static void devm_clk_bulk_release(struct device *dev, void *res)
> static int __devm_clk_bulk_get(struct device *dev, int num_clks,
> struct clk_bulk_data *clks, bool optional)
> {
> - struct clk_bulk_devres *devres;
> int ret;
>
> - devres = devres_alloc(devm_clk_bulk_release,
> - sizeof(*devres), GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!devres)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> -
> if (optional)
> ret = clk_bulk_get_optional(dev, num_clks, clks);
> else
> ret = clk_bulk_get(dev, num_clks, clks);
> - if (!ret) {
> - devres->clks = clks;
> - devres->num_clks = num_clks;
> - devres_add(dev, devres);
> - } else {
> - devres_free(devres);
> - }
> +
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + ret = devm_vadd(dev, my_clk_bulk_put, clk_bulk_args, num_clks, clks);
>
> return ret;
return devm_vadd(...);
> }
> @@ -128,30 +109,22 @@ static int devm_clk_match(struct device *dev, void *res, void *data)
>
> void devm_clk_put(struct device *dev, struct clk *clk)
> {
> - int ret;
> -
> - ret = devres_release(dev, devm_clk_release, devm_clk_match, clk);
> -
> - WARN_ON(ret);
> + WARN_ON(devres_release(dev, my_clk_put, devm_clk_match, clk));
Getting rid of "ret" is an unrelated change, which actually increases
kernel size, as the WARN_ON() parameter is stringified for the warning
message.
The rest looks good, so with the above fixed:
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists