[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMzpN2j7hO6vpopjc8po+v-9u3mmQ5Z_ZefVai3pJeV823_7Uw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2020 15:06:14 -0500
From: Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/8] x86-32: Enable syscall wrappers
On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 2:01 PM Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 5:28 AM Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > Enable pt_regs based syscalls for 32-bit. This makes the 32-bit native
> > kernel consistent with the 64-bit kernel, and improves the syscall
> > interface by not needing to push all 6 potential arguments onto the stack.
>
> Was the change to the table mechanically generated or mechanically
> verified? If so, how?
It was done by hand, but I can look into writing a script to verify it.
> After this goes in, I should dust off my code to get rid of all the
> __abi crud in the tables. I never quite got it working well enough,
> but your series should help.
That would be nice. After my patches, everything has the ABI prefix
to the functions.
--
Brian Gerst
Powered by blists - more mailing lists