lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200228194456.8C147246B7@mail.kernel.org>
Date:   Fri, 28 Feb 2020 19:44:55 +0000
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] loop: avoid EAGAIN, if offset or block_size are changed

Hi

[This is an automated email]

This commit has been processed because it contains a "Fixes:" tag
fixing commit: 5db470e229e2 ("loop: drop caches if offset or block_size are changed").

The bot has tested the following trees: v5.5.6, v5.4.22, v4.19.106, v4.14.171.

v5.5.6: Build OK!
v5.4.22: Build OK!
v4.19.106: Build OK!
v4.14.171: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
    3148ffbdb916 ("loop: use killable lock in ioctls")
    550df5fdacff ("loop: Push loop_ctl_mutex down to loop_set_status()")
    757ecf40b7e0 ("loop: Push loop_ctl_mutex down to loop_set_fd()")
    85b0a54a82e4 ("loop: Move loop_reread_partitions() out of loop_ctl_mutex")
    a13165441d58 ("loop: Push lo_ctl_mutex down into individual ioctls")
    c371077000f4 ("loop: Push loop_ctl_mutex down to loop_change_fd()")


NOTE: The patch will not be queued to stable trees until it is upstream.

How should we proceed with this patch?

-- 
Thanks
Sasha

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ