linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/9] tty: serial: fsl_lpuart: handle EPROBE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 28 Feb 2020 22:50:51 +0100
From:   Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
To:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Cc:     Li Yang <leoyang.li@....com>,
        "open list:SERIAL DRIVERS" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        "moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>,
        Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>,
        Vabhav Sharma <vabhav.sharma@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/9] tty: serial: fsl_lpuart: handle EPROBE_DEFER for
 DMA

Am 2020-02-28 12:46, schrieb Michael Walle:
> Hi Rob, Hi Leo,
> 
> Am 2020-02-28 00:03, schrieb Rob Herring:
>> On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 4:49 PM Li Yang <leoyang.li@....com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 4:35 PM Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org> 
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 11:48 AM Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc> wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > The DMA channel might not be available at the first probe time. This is
>>> > > esp. the case if the DMA controller has an IOMMU mapping.
>>> > >
>>> > > Use the new dma_request_chan() API and handle EPROBE_DEFER errors. Also
>>> > > reorder the code a bit, so that we don't prepare the whole UART just to
>>> > > determine that the DMA channel is not ready yet and we have to undo all
>>> > > the stuff. Try to map the DMA channels earlier.
>>> >
>>> > Changing this means you never probe successfully if you boot a kernel
>>> > with the DMA driver disabled (or it's IOMMU disabled). Some other
>>> > drivers request DMA in open() and can work either way.
> 
> Oh, I see.
> 
>>> We got this exact issue previously with another driver.  When the
> 
> What driver is it? I've been working on the i2c-mxs.c driver which has

whoops, i2c-imx.c, not i2c-mxs.c

-michael

> the same problem. Ie. its not working with DMA when the IOMMU is 
> enabled.
> Now that I've learned that dma_request_chan() will return EPROBE_DEFER
> if the actual DMA driver is not available, I don't think there is any
> trick like this there. There is no function which would be called late
> except you'd do something like on the first master_xfer() try to 
> request
> the DMA channels. But I don't think that would be the way to go.
> 
> -michael
> 
>>> required DMA driver is disabled, the DMA framework cannot figure out
>>> this situation and keeps returning EPROBE_DEFER.  I'm wondering if we
>>> should update the DMA framework to use your deferred probe timeout
>>> mechanism.  Is it still only used for debug purpose?
>> 
>> It's undergoing some rework ATM to not just be for debug. However,
>> it's not really going to help you if you care about the console
>> because waiting for the timeout will be too late to register the
>> console.