[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <639a1df72fbeda77436b282a99f17995@walle.cc>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2020 12:46:01 +0100
From: Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
To: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: Li Yang <leoyang.li@....com>,
"open list:SERIAL DRIVERS" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>,
Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>,
Vabhav Sharma <vabhav.sharma@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/9] tty: serial: fsl_lpuart: handle EPROBE_DEFER for
DMA
Hi Rob, Hi Leo,
Am 2020-02-28 00:03, schrieb Rob Herring:
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 4:49 PM Li Yang <leoyang.li@....com> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 4:35 PM Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 11:48 AM Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > The DMA channel might not be available at the first probe time. This is
>> > > esp. the case if the DMA controller has an IOMMU mapping.
>> > >
>> > > Use the new dma_request_chan() API and handle EPROBE_DEFER errors. Also
>> > > reorder the code a bit, so that we don't prepare the whole UART just to
>> > > determine that the DMA channel is not ready yet and we have to undo all
>> > > the stuff. Try to map the DMA channels earlier.
>> >
>> > Changing this means you never probe successfully if you boot a kernel
>> > with the DMA driver disabled (or it's IOMMU disabled). Some other
>> > drivers request DMA in open() and can work either way.
Oh, I see.
>> We got this exact issue previously with another driver. When the
What driver is it? I've been working on the i2c-mxs.c driver which has
the same problem. Ie. its not working with DMA when the IOMMU is
enabled.
Now that I've learned that dma_request_chan() will return EPROBE_DEFER
if the actual DMA driver is not available, I don't think there is any
trick like this there. There is no function which would be called late
except you'd do something like on the first master_xfer() try to request
the DMA channels. But I don't think that would be the way to go.
-michael
>> required DMA driver is disabled, the DMA framework cannot figure out
>> this situation and keeps returning EPROBE_DEFER. I'm wondering if we
>> should update the DMA framework to use your deferred probe timeout
>> mechanism. Is it still only used for debug purpose?
>
> It's undergoing some rework ATM to not just be for debug. However,
> it's not really going to help you if you care about the console
> because waiting for the timeout will be too late to register the
> console.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists