[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZwaKA-Gq4wjkPZ_VFiOgNgvLPnYmx4A3AFE-0eNNjQpQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2020 23:43:16 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@...sulko.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>,
Chris Brandt <chris.brandt@...esas.com>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] gpio: of: Extract of_gpiochip_add_hog()
On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 6:18 PM Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com> wrote:
> On 2/21/20 10:08 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > Patch applied with Frank's Review tag.
>
> I created a devicetree unittest to show the problem that Geert's patches
> fix.
>
> I would prefer to have my unittest patch series applied somewhere,
> immediately followed by Geert's patch series. This way, after
> applying my series, a test fail is reported, then after Geert's
> series is applied, the test fail becomes a test pass.
>
> Can you coordinate with Rob to accept both series either via
> your tree or Rob's tree?
I see Rob already applied the test.
I do not personally bother much about which order problems
get solved but I guess if Rob can back out the patch I can apply
it to my tree instead, before these patches. for some time,
before I start pulling stuff on top.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists