linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] gpio: of: Extract of_gpiochip_add

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ecde265b-f451-7514-2265-cf4d3024690b@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 2 Mar 2020 13:57:34 -0600
From:   Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>
To:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
        Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@...sulko.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>,
        Chris Brandt <chris.brandt@...esas.com>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] gpio: of: Extract of_gpiochip_add_hog()

On 2/28/20 4:43 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 6:18 PM Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com> wrote:
>> On 2/21/20 10:08 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> 
>>> Patch applied with Frank's Review tag.
>>
>> I created a devicetree unittest to show the problem that Geert's patches
>> fix.
>>
>> I would prefer to have my unittest patch series applied somewhere,
>> immediately followed by Geert's patch series.  This way, after
>> applying my series, a test fail is reported, then after Geert's
>> series is applied, the test fail becomes a test pass.
>>
>> Can you coordinate with Rob to accept both series either via
>> your tree or Rob's tree?
> 
> I see Rob already applied the test.
> 
> I do not personally bother much about which order problems
> get solved but I guess if Rob can back out the patch I can apply
> it to my tree instead, before these patches. for some time,
> before I start pulling stuff on top.
> 
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij
> 

At this point, if it is a lot of trouble or confusion, I would not
bother undoing the commits that have been done.  I'll leave it up
to you and Rob to coordinate if you do decide to undo.

-Frank