linux-kernel - [PATCH v2] EDAC: synopsys: Fix the wrong call of pinf->col parameter

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1582856183-5007-1-git-send-email-sherry.sun@nxp.com>
Date:   Fri, 28 Feb 2020 10:16:23 +0800
From:   Sherry Sun <sherry.sun@....com>
To:     bp@...en8.de, mchehab@...nel.org, tony.luck@...el.com,
        james.morse@....com, rrichter@...vell.com, michal.simek@...inx.com,
        manish.narani@...inx.com
Cc:     linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-imx@....com, frank.li@....com
Subject: [PATCH v2] EDAC: synopsys: Fix the wrong call of pinf->col parameter

Since ZynqMP platform call zynqmp_get_error_info() function to get ce/ue
information. In this function, pinf->col parameter is not used, this
parameter is only used by Zynq platforme in zynq_get_error_info(). So
here pinf->col should not be called and printed for ZynqMP, need remove
it.

Fixes: b500b4a029d57 ("EDAC, synopsys: Add ECC support for ZynqMP DDR controller")
Signed-off-by: Sherry Sun <sherry.sun@....com>
---
This patch is based on [PATCH V2] EDAC: synopsys: Fix back to back snprintf() messages for CE/UE
Changes in V2:
- Separated this patch from the original patchset.

---
 drivers/edac/synopsys_edac.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/edac/synopsys_edac.c b/drivers/edac/synopsys_edac.c
index 880ffd833718..da707d539f7f 100644
--- a/drivers/edac/synopsys_edac.c
+++ b/drivers/edac/synopsys_edac.c
@@ -484,8 +484,8 @@ static void handle_error(struct mem_ctl_info *mci, struct synps_ecc_status *p)
 				 pinf->bitpos, pinf->data);
 		} else {
 			snprintf(priv->message, SYNPS_EDAC_MSG_SIZE,
-				 "DDR ECC error type:%s Row %d Bank %d Col %d BankGroup Number %d Block Number %d Bit Position: %d Data: 0x%08x",
-				 "CE", pinf->row, pinf->bank, pinf->col,
+				 "DDR ECC error type:%s Row %d Bank %d BankGroup Number %d Block Number %d Bit Position: %d Data: 0x%08x",
+				 "CE", pinf->row, pinf->bank,
 				 pinf->bankgrpnr, pinf->blknr,
 				 pinf->bitpos, pinf->data);
 		}
@@ -503,8 +503,8 @@ static void handle_error(struct mem_ctl_info *mci, struct synps_ecc_status *p)
 				"UE", pinf->row, pinf->bank, pinf->col);
 		} else {
 			snprintf(priv->message, SYNPS_EDAC_MSG_SIZE,
-				 "DDR ECC error type :%s Row %d Bank %d Col %d BankGroup Number %d Block Number %d",
-				 "UE", pinf->row, pinf->bank, pinf->col,
+				 "DDR ECC error type :%s Row %d Bank %d BankGroup Number %d Block Number %d",
+				 "UE", pinf->row, pinf->bank,
 				 pinf->bankgrpnr, pinf->blknr);
 		}
 
-- 
2.17.1