[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <F5AAAD52-2C1D-4B14-AA7E-590D026C7DBE@goldelico.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Feb 2020 19:58:21 +0100
From: "H. Nikolaus Schaller" <hns@...delico.com>
To: Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
Cc: Paul Boddie <paul@...die.org.uk>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
Paul Burton <paulburton@...nel.org>,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, letux-kernel@...nphoenux.org,
kernel@...a-handheld.com, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] MIPS: DTS: CI20: fix PMU definitions for ACT8600
Hi Paul,
> Am 29.02.2020 um 17:09 schrieb Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>:
>
> Hi Nikolaus,
>
>
> Le ven., févr. 28, 2020 at 19:02, H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@...delico.com> a écrit :
>> There is a ACT8600 on the CI20 board and the bindings of the
>> ACT8865 driver have changed without updating the CI20 device
>> tree. Therefore the PMU can not be probed successfully and
>> is running in power-on reset state.
>> Fix DT to match the latest act8865-regulator bindings.
>> Fixes: 73f2b940474d ("MIPS: CI20: DTS: Add I2C nodes")
>> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@...delico.com>
>> ---
>> arch/mips/boot/dts/ingenic/ci20.dts | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++---------
>> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>> diff --git a/arch/mips/boot/dts/ingenic/ci20.dts b/arch/mips/boot/dts/ingenic/ci20.dts
>> index 59c104289ece..44741e927d2b 100644
>> --- a/arch/mips/boot/dts/ingenic/ci20.dts
>> +++ b/arch/mips/boot/dts/ingenic/ci20.dts
>> @@ -4,6 +4,8 @@
>> #include "jz4780.dtsi"
>> #include <dt-bindings/clock/ingenic,tcu.h>
>> #include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
>> +#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
>
> This include should be in patch 3/5 where it's first used.
Yes. That is much better.
>
> With that fixed:
> Reviewed-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
>
> for the whole series.
What is easier: that you fix it during applying somewhere
or should I send a v5?
BR,
Nikolaus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists