[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1583004801.3.3@crapouillou.net>
Date: Sat, 29 Feb 2020 16:33:21 -0300
From: Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
To: "H. Nikolaus Schaller" <hns@...delico.com>
Cc: Paul Boddie <paul@...die.org.uk>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
Paul Burton <paulburton@...nel.org>,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, letux-kernel@...nphoenux.org,
kernel@...a-handheld.com, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] MIPS: DTS: CI20: fix PMU definitions for ACT8600
Hi Nikolaus,
Le sam., févr. 29, 2020 at 19:58, H. Nikolaus Schaller
<hns@...delico.com> a écrit :
> Hi Paul,
>
>> Am 29.02.2020 um 17:09 schrieb Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>:
>>
>> Hi Nikolaus,
>>
>>
>> Le ven., févr. 28, 2020 at 19:02, H. Nikolaus Schaller
>> <hns@...delico.com> a écrit :
>>> There is a ACT8600 on the CI20 board and the bindings of the
>>> ACT8865 driver have changed without updating the CI20 device
>>> tree. Therefore the PMU can not be probed successfully and
>>> is running in power-on reset state.
>>> Fix DT to match the latest act8865-regulator bindings.
>>> Fixes: 73f2b940474d ("MIPS: CI20: DTS: Add I2C nodes")
>>> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
>>> Signed-off-by: H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@...delico.com>
>>> ---
>>> arch/mips/boot/dts/ingenic/ci20.dts | 48
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++---------
>>> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>>> diff --git a/arch/mips/boot/dts/ingenic/ci20.dts
>>> b/arch/mips/boot/dts/ingenic/ci20.dts
>>> index 59c104289ece..44741e927d2b 100644
>>> --- a/arch/mips/boot/dts/ingenic/ci20.dts
>>> +++ b/arch/mips/boot/dts/ingenic/ci20.dts
>>> @@ -4,6 +4,8 @@
>>> #include "jz4780.dtsi"
>>> #include <dt-bindings/clock/ingenic,tcu.h>
>>> #include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
>>> +#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
>>
>> This include should be in patch 3/5 where it's first used.
>
> Yes. That is much better.
>
>>
>> With that fixed:
>> Reviewed-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
>>
>> for the whole series.
>
> What is easier: that you fix it during applying somewhere
> or should I send a v5?
I guess send a V5.
- Paul
>
> BR,
> Nikolaus
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists