| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20200302230128.GE5513@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2020 07:01:28 +0800
From: Philip Li <philip.li@...el.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>, kbuild-all@...ts.01.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [kbuild-all] Re: [PATCH 3/3] proc: Remove the now unnecessary
internal mount of proc
On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 10:49:15PM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com> writes:
>
> > Hi "Eric,
> >
> > Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
>
> Dear kbuild robot,
>
> Yep. You got it the wrong base. I will see about using --base
thanks for the feedback, we will also take a look to see
how to better identify the base automatically.
> if I repost, or have another patchset that so clearly needs
> to be applied on top of a non-default base.
>
> Thank you for writing me how to do that.
>
> Eric
>
>
> > [auto build test ERROR on uml/linux-next]
> > [also build test ERROR on linux/master kees/for-next/pstore linus/master v5.6-rc3 next-20200228]
> > [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
> > improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base' option to specify the
> > base tree in git format-patch, please see https://stackoverflow.com/a/37406982]
> >
> > url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Eric-W-Biederman/proc-Actually-honor-the-mount-options/20200229-100926
> > base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rw/uml.git linux-next
> > config: x86_64-defconfig (attached as .config)
> > compiler: gcc-7 (Debian 7.5.0-5) 7.5.0
> > reproduce:
> > # save the attached .config to linux build tree
> > make ARCH=x86_64
> >
> > If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag
> > Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> >
> > All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
> >
> > fs/proc/base.c: In function 'proc_flush_task':
> >>> fs/proc/base.c:3217:33: error: 'struct pid_namespace' has no member named 'proc_mnt'; did you mean 'proc_self'?
> > proc_flush_task_mnt(upid->ns->proc_mnt, upid->nr,
> > ^~~~~~~~
> > proc_self
> >
> > vim +3217 fs/proc/base.c
> >
> > ^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 3180
> > 0895e91d60ef9b Randy Dunlap 2007-10-21 3181 /**
> > 0895e91d60ef9b Randy Dunlap 2007-10-21 3182 * proc_flush_task - Remove dcache entries for @task from the /proc dcache.
> > 0895e91d60ef9b Randy Dunlap 2007-10-21 3183 * @task: task that should be flushed.
> > 0895e91d60ef9b Randy Dunlap 2007-10-21 3184 *
> > 0895e91d60ef9b Randy Dunlap 2007-10-21 3185 * When flushing dentries from proc, one needs to flush them from global
> > 60347f6716aa49 Pavel Emelyanov 2007-10-18 3186 * proc (proc_mnt) and from all the namespaces' procs this task was seen
> > 0895e91d60ef9b Randy Dunlap 2007-10-21 3187 * in. This call is supposed to do all of this job.
> > 0895e91d60ef9b Randy Dunlap 2007-10-21 3188 *
> > 0895e91d60ef9b Randy Dunlap 2007-10-21 3189 * Looks in the dcache for
> > 0895e91d60ef9b Randy Dunlap 2007-10-21 3190 * /proc/@pid
> > 0895e91d60ef9b Randy Dunlap 2007-10-21 3191 * /proc/@...d/task/@pid
> > 0895e91d60ef9b Randy Dunlap 2007-10-21 3192 * if either directory is present flushes it and all of it'ts children
> > 0895e91d60ef9b Randy Dunlap 2007-10-21 3193 * from the dcache.
> > 0895e91d60ef9b Randy Dunlap 2007-10-21 3194 *
> > 0895e91d60ef9b Randy Dunlap 2007-10-21 3195 * It is safe and reasonable to cache /proc entries for a task until
> > 0895e91d60ef9b Randy Dunlap 2007-10-21 3196 * that task exits. After that they just clog up the dcache with
> > 0895e91d60ef9b Randy Dunlap 2007-10-21 3197 * useless entries, possibly causing useful dcache entries to be
> > 0895e91d60ef9b Randy Dunlap 2007-10-21 3198 * flushed instead. This routine is proved to flush those useless
> > 0895e91d60ef9b Randy Dunlap 2007-10-21 3199 * dcache entries at process exit time.
> > 0895e91d60ef9b Randy Dunlap 2007-10-21 3200 *
> > 0895e91d60ef9b Randy Dunlap 2007-10-21 3201 * NOTE: This routine is just an optimization so it does not guarantee
> > 0895e91d60ef9b Randy Dunlap 2007-10-21 3202 * that no dcache entries will exist at process exit time it
> > 0895e91d60ef9b Randy Dunlap 2007-10-21 3203 * just makes it very unlikely that any will persist.
> > 60347f6716aa49 Pavel Emelyanov 2007-10-18 3204 */
> > 60347f6716aa49 Pavel Emelyanov 2007-10-18 3205
> > 60347f6716aa49 Pavel Emelyanov 2007-10-18 3206 void proc_flush_task(struct task_struct *task)
> > 60347f6716aa49 Pavel Emelyanov 2007-10-18 3207 {
> > 9fcc2d15b14894 Eric W. Biederman 2007-11-14 3208 int i;
> > 9b4d1cbef8f41a Oleg Nesterov 2009-09-22 3209 struct pid *pid, *tgid;
> > 130f77ecb2e7d5 Pavel Emelyanov 2007-10-18 3210 struct upid *upid;
> > 130f77ecb2e7d5 Pavel Emelyanov 2007-10-18 3211
> > 130f77ecb2e7d5 Pavel Emelyanov 2007-10-18 3212 pid = task_pid(task);
> > 130f77ecb2e7d5 Pavel Emelyanov 2007-10-18 3213 tgid = task_tgid(task);
> > 9fcc2d15b14894 Eric W. Biederman 2007-11-14 3214
> > 9fcc2d15b14894 Eric W. Biederman 2007-11-14 3215 for (i = 0; i <= pid->level; i++) {
> > 130f77ecb2e7d5 Pavel Emelyanov 2007-10-18 3216 upid = &pid->numbers[i];
> > 130f77ecb2e7d5 Pavel Emelyanov 2007-10-18 @3217 proc_flush_task_mnt(upid->ns->proc_mnt, upid->nr,
> > 9b4d1cbef8f41a Oleg Nesterov 2009-09-22 3218 tgid->numbers[i].nr);
> > 130f77ecb2e7d5 Pavel Emelyanov 2007-10-18 3219 }
> > 60347f6716aa49 Pavel Emelyanov 2007-10-18 3220 }
> > 60347f6716aa49 Pavel Emelyanov 2007-10-18 3221
> >
> > :::::: The code at line 3217 was first introduced by commit
> > :::::: 130f77ecb2e7d5ac3e53e620f55e374f4a406b20 pid namespaces: make proc_flush_task() actually from entries from multiple namespaces
> >
> > :::::: TO: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>
> > :::::: CC: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...dy.linux-foundation.org>
> >
> > ---
> > 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
> > https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org
> _______________________________________________
> kbuild-all mailing list -- kbuild-all@...ts.01.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to kbuild-all-leave@...ts.01.org
Powered by blists - more mailing lists