linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] Port KASAN Tests to KUnit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 2 Mar 2020 15:02:05 -0800
From:   Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:     Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>
Cc:     Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
        Patricia Alfonso <trishalfonso@...gle.com>,
        Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
        David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kasan-dev <kasan-dev@...glegroups.com>,
        "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" 
        <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
        KUnit Development <kunit-dev@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] Port KASAN Tests to KUnit

On Mon, Mar 02, 2020 at 02:36:48PM -0800, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 9:52 AM Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
> > I'm all for unittests (I have earlier kind-of-unit-tests in
> > lib/test_user_copy.c lib/test_overflow.c etc), but most of LKDTM is
> 
> <Minor tangent (sorry)>
> 
> I took a brief look at lib/test_user_copy.c, it looks like it doesn't
> use TAP formatted output. How do you feel about someone converting
> them over to use KUnit? If nothing else, it would be good getting all
> the unit-ish tests to output in the same format.
> 
> I proposed converting over some of the runtime tests over to KUnit as
> a LKMP project (Linux Kernel Mentorship Program) here:
> 
> https://wiki.linuxfoundation.org/lkmp/lkmp_project_list#convert_runtime_tests_to_kunit_tests
> 
> I am curious what you think about this.
> 
> </Minor tangent>

Yes please! Anything that helps these tests get more exposure/wider
testing is good. (That said, I don't want to lose any of the existing
diagnostic messages -- _adding_ TAP would be lovely.)

-- 
Kees Cook