[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200302064357.ke57i2wchulph5f7@pengutronix.de>
Date:   Mon, 2 Mar 2020 07:43:57 +0100
From:   Uwe Kleine-König 
        <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To:     Roy Im <roy.im.opensource@...semi.com>
Cc:     Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
        Brian Masney <masneyb@...tation.org>,
        Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, Luca Weiss <luca@...tu.xyz>,
        Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@...il.com>,
        Pascal PAILLET-LME <p.paillet@...com>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Support Opensource <Support.Opensource@...semi.com>,
        "linux-input@...r.kernel.org" <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V9 3/3] Input: new da7280 haptic driver
Hey Roy,
On Mon, Mar 02, 2020 at 01:52:30AM +0000, Roy Im wrote:
> On Monday, March 2, 2020 6:20 AM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 12:59:20AM +0000, Roy Im wrote:
> > > Okay, thanks. I have tried to update that as below.
> > > Could I get your comment if you still see anything on this?
> > >
> > > 	/* Maximum gain is 0x7fff for PWM mode */
> > > 	#define MAX_MAGNITUDE_SHIFT		15
> > >        [...]
> > > 	period_mag_multi >>= MAX_MAGNITUDE_SHIFT;
> > >
> > > 	/* The interpretation of duty cycle depends on the acc_en,
> > > 	* it should be from 50% to 100% for acc_en = 0.
> > > 	* See datasheet 'PWM mode' section for more details.
> > > 	*/
> > > 	if (!haptics->acc_en) {
> > > 		period_mag_multi += state.period;
> > > 		period_mag_multi /= 2;
> > > 	}
> > 
> > Much better. Extra points if you add a link to the datasheet at the top of the driver. I didn't look at the datasheet and
> > assume that the reasoning is obvious then.
> 
> Okay, then do you think it would be better to remove that comment(the 3rd line - datasheet)?. 
No, please keep the reference.
Best regards
Uwe
-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
