[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200302101210.GW2667@lahna.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2020 12:12:10 +0200
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
Martin Volf <martin.volf.42@...il.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org,
linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] i2c: i801: Fix iTCO_wdt resource creation if PMC
is not present
On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 06:03:42PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 04:21:19PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This series aims to fix the issue reported by Martin Volf [1] that prevents
> > the nct6775 driver from loading.
> >
> > I added Fixes tag to the last patch but not stable tag because the other
> > two patches it depends are not really stable material IMO. Please let me
> > know if there is a better way to organize these :)
> >
> > I tested this on Intel Whiskey Lake based system (CNL derived) and on Comet
> > Lake-V based system (SPT derived and the iTCO_wdt still works and I can see
> > the expected resources in /proc/ioports and /proc/iomem.
> >
> > The previous version of the patch series can be found here:
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-hwmon/20200225123802.88984-1-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com/
> >
> > Changes from the previous version:
> >
> > * Call request_region() also for iTCO_vendorsupport
> > * Drop the core populating ICH_RES_IO_SMI completely from i2c-i801.c
> >
> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-hwmon/CAM1AHpQ4196tyD=HhBu-2donSsuogabkfP03v1YF26Q7_BgvgA@mail.gmail.com/
>
> I can take this series via I2C. Just wanted to let you know that I am
> aiming for rc5, because I'd like to have this in linux-next for a week
> to make sure we don't regress again (despite all precautions) somewhere
> else.
Makes sense, thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists