[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200302105309.GP1224808@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2020 12:53:09 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpiolib: Fix inverted check in gpiochip_remove()
On Mon, Mar 02, 2020 at 09:24:48AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> The optimization to check for requested lines actually optimized for the
> uncomon error case, where one of the GPIO lines is still in use.
> Hence the error message must be printed when the loop is terminated
> early, not when it went through all available GPIO lines.
>
> Fixes: 869233f81337bfb3 ("gpiolib: Optimize gpiochip_remove() when check for requested line")
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
> ---
> Noticed by review, tested by creating and destroying an otherwise unused
> GPIO aggregator, which triggers:
>
> gpio gpiochip8: REMOVING GPIOCHIP WITH GPIOS STILL REQUESTED
Thank you!
Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Linus, see below.
> ---
> drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> index 4e78bdc2739693c3..6180cf84fab7ce5e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> @@ -1823,7 +1823,7 @@ void gpiochip_remove(struct gpio_chip *chip)
> }
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gpio_lock, flags);
>
> - if (i == gdev->ngpio)
> + if (i != gdev->ngpio)
I prefer more explicit <.
I had sent a patch (before I noticed this), so it's up to Linus which one to choose.
> dev_crit(&gdev->dev,
> "REMOVING GPIOCHIP WITH GPIOS STILL REQUESTED\n");
>
> --
> 2.17.1
>
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists