lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 4 Mar 2020 19:22:30 +0800
From:   Zhou Yanjie <zhouyanjie@...yeetech.com>
To:     Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        tglx@...utronix.de, jason@...edaemon.net, sboyd@...nel.org,
        mturquette@...libre.com, mark.rutland@....com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, paul@...pouillou.net,
        sernia.zhou@...mail.com, zhenwenjin@...il.com,
        dongsheng.qiu@...enic.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] irqchip: Ingenic: Add support for TCU of X1000.

Hi Marc,

On 2020年03月04日 18:58, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 2020-02-19 08:29, 周琰杰 wrote:
>> X1000 has a different TCU containing OST, since X1000, OST has been
>> independent of TCU. This patch is prepare for later OST driver.
>
> You keep on talking about OST (whatever that is), but never deals with 
> it.

Sorry, I didn't make it clear. My intention was to explain why we need 
to add an IRQCHIP_DECLARE to x1000 separately.

> Why don't you just say
>
> "Enable TCU support for Ingenic X1000, which can be supported by
> the existing driver."
>
> as this is what the patch is doing?

Yes, this patch is to ensure that TCU can be used normally when the new 
OST driver is merged, thank you for your suggestion.

Thanks and best regards!

>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: 周琰杰 (Zhou Yanjie) <zhouyanjie@...yeetech.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/irqchip/irq-ingenic-tcu.c | 1 +
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-ingenic-tcu.c
>> b/drivers/irqchip/irq-ingenic-tcu.c
>> index 6d05cef..7a7222d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-ingenic-tcu.c
>> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-ingenic-tcu.c
>> @@ -180,3 +180,4 @@ static int __init ingenic_tcu_irq_init(struct
>> device_node *np,
>>  IRQCHIP_DECLARE(jz4740_tcu_irq, "ingenic,jz4740-tcu", 
>> ingenic_tcu_irq_init);
>>  IRQCHIP_DECLARE(jz4725b_tcu_irq, "ingenic,jz4725b-tcu", 
>> ingenic_tcu_irq_init);
>>  IRQCHIP_DECLARE(jz4770_tcu_irq, "ingenic,jz4770-tcu", 
>> ingenic_tcu_irq_init);
>> +IRQCHIP_DECLARE(x1000_tcu_irq, "ingenic,x1000-tcu", 
>> ingenic_tcu_irq_init);
>
> Otherwise,
>
> Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
>
> I expect this to go via the MIPS tree as a series.
>
> Thanks,
>
>         M.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ