linux-kernel - Re: [v5] Documentation: bootconfig: Update boot configuration documentation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200305140004.535eeb1a@gandalf.local.home>
Date:   Thu, 5 Mar 2020 14:00:04 -0500
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
Cc:     Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v5] Documentation: bootconfig: Update boot configuration
 documentation

On Thu, 5 Mar 2020 19:43:59 +0100
Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de> wrote:

> >>> If you would (could) be more concrete (or discrete) in your suggestions,
> >>> I would be glad to comment on them.  
> >>
> >> Does this view indicate any communication difficulties?  
> >
> > Probably.
> >  
> >> Which of the possibly unanswered issues do you find not concrete enough so far?  
> >
> > e.g.:  
> >>>>  Will the clarification become more constructive for remaining challenges?  
> 
> Do you expect that known open issues need to be repeated for each patch revision?

I'm clueless about what you are talking about. Yes there's communication
difficulties.

> 
> How do you think about the desired tracking of bug reports
> also for this software?

What does that statement have to do with this patch series????


-- Steve