linux-kernel - Re: [v5] Documentation: bootconfig: Update boot configuration documentation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ac1c953b-fa5d-818d-5232-19a28f52f556@web.de>
Date:   Thu, 5 Mar 2020 20:06:47 +0100
From:   Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To:     Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v5] Documentation: bootconfig: Update boot configuration
 documentation

>>>> Which of the possibly unanswered issues do you find not concrete enough so far?
>>>
>>> e.g.:
>>>>>>  Will the clarification become more constructive for remaining challenges?
>>
>> Do you expect that known open issues need to be repeated for each patch revision?
>
> Ideally not, but not very much is ideal.

Did you notice any aspects where I would be still looking for more helpful answers?


> IOW, it is sometimes required (if one cares enough; sometimes
> one just gives up).

I find this communication detail unfortunate occasionally.


>> How do you think about the desired tracking of bug reports
>> also for this software?
…
> Masami seems to be responsive.

The involved contributors show different response delays, don't they?

Regards,
Markus