[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <711479725.2305.1583484191776.JavaMail.zimbra@inango-systems.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2020 10:43:11 +0200 (IST)
From: Nikolai Merinov <n.merinov@...ngo-systems.com>
To: hch <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
linux-efi <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-block <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] partitions/efi: Fix partition name parsing in GUID
partition entry
Hi Christoph,
Should I perform any other steps in order to get this change in the master?
Regards,
Nikolai
----- Original Message -----
> From: "hch" <hch@...radead.org>
> To: "n merinov" <n.merinov@...ngo-systems.com>
> Cc: "hch" <hch@...radead.org>, "Davidlohr Bueso" <dave@...olabs.net>, "Jens Axboe" <axboe@...nel.dk>, "Ard Biesheuvel"
> <ardb@...nel.org>, "linux-efi" <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-block" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel"
> <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
> Sent: Monday, February 24, 2020 10:08:13 PM
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] partitions/efi: Fix partition name parsing in GUID partition entry
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 01:38:39PM +0200, Nikolai Merinov wrote:
>> Hi Christoph,
>>
>> > I'd rather use plain __le16 and le16_to_cpu here. Also the be
>> > variants seems to be entirely unused.
>>
>> Looks like I misunderstood your comment from
>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11309223/:
>>
>> > Please add a an efi_char_from_cpu or similarly named helper
>> > to encapsulate this logic.
>>
>> The "le16_to_cpu(ptes[i].partition_name[label_count])" call is the
>> full implementation of the "efi_char_from_cpu" logic. Do you want
>> to encapsulate "utf16_le_to_7bit_string" logic entirely like in
>> the attached version?
>
> I think I though of just the inner loop, but your new version looks even
> better, so:
>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists