lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <711479725.2305.1583484191776.JavaMail.zimbra@inango-systems.com>
Date:   Fri, 6 Mar 2020 10:43:11 +0200 (IST)
From:   Nikolai Merinov <n.merinov@...ngo-systems.com>
To:     hch <hch@...radead.org>
Cc:     Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
        linux-efi <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-block <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] partitions/efi: Fix partition name parsing in GUID
 partition entry

Hi Christoph,

Should I perform any other steps in order to get this change in the master?

Regards,
Nikolai

----- Original Message -----
> From: "hch" <hch@...radead.org>
> To: "n merinov" <n.merinov@...ngo-systems.com>
> Cc: "hch" <hch@...radead.org>, "Davidlohr Bueso" <dave@...olabs.net>, "Jens Axboe" <axboe@...nel.dk>, "Ard Biesheuvel"
> <ardb@...nel.org>, "linux-efi" <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-block" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel"
> <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
> Sent: Monday, February 24, 2020 10:08:13 PM
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] partitions/efi: Fix partition name parsing in GUID partition entry

> On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 01:38:39PM +0200, Nikolai Merinov wrote:
>> Hi Christoph,
>> 
>> > I'd rather use plain __le16 and le16_to_cpu here. Also the be
>> > variants seems to be entirely unused.
>> 
>> Looks like I misunderstood your comment from
>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11309223/:
>> 
>> > Please add a an efi_char_from_cpu or similarly named helper
>> > to encapsulate this logic.
>> 
>> The "le16_to_cpu(ptes[i].partition_name[label_count])" call is the
>> full implementation of the "efi_char_from_cpu" logic. Do you want
>> to encapsulate "utf16_le_to_7bit_string" logic entirely like in
>> the attached version?
> 
> I think I though of just the inner loop, but your new version looks even
> better, so:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ