linux-kernel - Re: [v1] dt-bindings: msm:disp: update dsi and dpu bindings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f24b45a36d2bd79c9d8053d29abef88d@codeaurora.org>
Date:   Fri, 06 Mar 2020 17:11:15 +0530
From:   harigovi@...eaurora.org
To:     Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc:     dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        freedreno <freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
        Sean Paul <seanpaul@...omium.org>,
        "Kristian H. Kristensen" <hoegsberg@...omium.org>,
        Kalyan Thota <kalyan_t@...eaurora.org>, nganji@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [v1] dt-bindings: msm:disp: update dsi and dpu bindings

On 2020-02-04 23:52, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 6:15 AM Harigovindan P <harigovi@...eaurora.org> 
> wrote:
>> 
>> Updating bindings of dsi and dpu by adding and removing certain
>> properties.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Harigovindan P <harigovi@...eaurora.org>
>> ---
>> 
>> Changes in v1:
>>         - Adding "ahb" clock as a required property.
>>         - Adding "bus", "rot", "lut" as optional properties for sc7180 
>> device.
>>         - Removing properties from dsi bindings that are unused.
>>         - Removing power-domain property since DSI is the child node 
>> of MDSS
>>           and it will inherit supply from its parent.
>> 
>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dpu.txt | 7 +++++++
>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi.txt | 5 -----
>>  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dpu.txt 
>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dpu.txt
>> index 551ae26..dd58472a 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dpu.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dpu.txt
>> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ Required properties:
>>    The following clocks are required:
>>    * "iface"
>>    * "bus"
>> +  * "ahb"
> 
> This is only required for sc7180?  ...or old SoCs should have had it
> all along too?
> 
> 
>>    * "core"
>>  - interrupts: interrupt signal from MDSS.
>>  - interrupt-controller: identifies the node as an interrupt 
>> controller.
>> @@ -50,6 +51,8 @@ Required properties:
>>  - clock-names: device clock names, must be in same order as clocks 
>> property.
>>    The following clocks are required.
>>    * "bus"
>> +  For the device "qcom,sc7180-dpu":
>> +  * "bus" - is an optional property due to architecture change.
> 
> This is a really odd way to write it for two reasons:
> * You're breaking up the flow of the list.
> * This shouldn't be listed as "optional" in sc7180 but unless there is
> some reason to ever provide it on sc7180.  It should simply be
> disallowed.
> 
> Maybe instead just:
> 
>    The following clocks are required.
> -  * "bus"
> +  * "bus" (anything other than qcom,sc7180-dpu)
> 
> We really need to get this into yaml ASAP but that'd probably be OK to
> tide us over.
> 
> NOTE: when converting to yaml, ideally we'll have a separate file per
> SoC to avoid crazy spaghetti, see commit 2a8aa18c1131 ("dt-bindings:
> clk: qcom: Fix self-validation, split, and clean cruft") in clk-next
> for an example of starting the transition to one yaml per SoC (at
> least for anything majorly different).
> 
> 
>>    * "iface"
>>    * "core"
>>    * "vsync"
>> @@ -70,6 +73,10 @@ Optional properties:
>>  - assigned-clocks: list of clock specifiers for clocks needing rate 
>> assignment
>>  - assigned-clock-rates: list of clock frequencies sorted in the same 
>> order as
>>    the assigned-clocks property.
>> +- For the device "qcom,sc7180-dpu":
>> +  clock-names: optional device clocks, needed for accessing LUT 
>> blocks.
>> +  * "rot"
>> +  * "lut"
>> 
>>  Example:
>> 
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi.txt 
>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi.txt
>> index af95586..61d659a 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi.txt
>> @@ -8,13 +8,10 @@ Required properties:
>>  - reg-names: The names of register regions. The following regions are 
>> required:
>>    * "dsi_ctrl"
>>  - interrupts: The interrupt signal from the DSI block.
>> -- power-domains: Should be <&mmcc MDSS_GDSC>.
> 
> Is this supposed to be removed from all SoCs using this bindings, or
> just yours?
> 
> I'll also note that you left it in the "Example:" below.
> 
> 
>>  - clocks: Phandles to device clocks.
>>  - clock-names: the following clocks are required:
>> -  * "mdp_core"
>>    * "iface"
>>    * "bus"
>> -  * "core_mmss"
> 
> As Jeffrey pointed out, you shouldn't be removing these from old SoCs.
> In "drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_cfg.c" you can clearly see them used.
> Maybe it's time for you to do the yaml conversion and handle this
> correctly per-SoC.
> 
> -Doug


Hi,

yaml files have been created and new patchset has been created for that.
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11423653/