linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] irqchip/mmp: A pair of robustness fixed

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200308140434.18b0f947@why>
Date:   Sun, 8 Mar 2020 14:04:34 +0000
From:   Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To:     Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@...sk>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] irqchip/mmp: A pair of robustness fixed

On Wed, 19 Feb 2020 09:00:22 +0100
Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@...sk> wrote:

[+RobH]

Lubomir,

> Hi,
> 
> please consider applying these two patches. Thery are not strictly
> necessary, but improve diagnostics in case the DT is faulty.

Can't we instead make sure our DT infrastructure checks for these? I'm
very reluctant to add more "DT validation" to the kernel, as it feels
like the wrong place to do this.

Thanks,

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...