linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] irq/domain: add a new callback to domain ops

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMRc=Me0AE7OgEVjiUfRUNODYoGj+LYy+1zGsGkXKput9AeKrA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 8 Mar 2020 18:59:06 +0100
From:   Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To:     Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
Cc:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
        Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] irq/domain: add a new callback to domain ops

niedz., 8 mar 2020 o 14:51 Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org> napisał(a):
>
> On Tue, 11 Feb 2020 14:12:37 +0100
> Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl> wrote:
>
> > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
> >
> > Add the remove() callback to irq_domain_ops which can be used to
> > automatically dispose of any host data associated with the domain when
> > irq_domain_remove() is called.
>
> I have a hard time buying this. Whatever data that is associated to the
> domain is already owned known by whoever created the domain the first
> place.
>
> Since the expected use case is that whoever created the domain also
> destroys it, the caller is already in a position to do its own cleanup,
> and we don't need any of this.
>
> So please explain what you are trying to achieve here.
>

I'm mainly trying to remove irq_domain_remove_sim() and make it
possible to destroy the interrupt simulator domain with regular
irq_domain_remove(). If you prefer that we retain this routine as is,
I can limit this series to the first two patches, but I assumed the
fewer functions in the interface, the better. If you have a different
idea on how to do this - please let me know too.

Bartosz