[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200309212540.GV2935@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72>
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2020 14:25:40 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: Instrumentation and RCU
On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 04:58:11PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Mar 2020 13:47:10 -0700
> "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> > Yeah, I know. Just what the kernel doesn't need, yet another variant
> > of RCU...
>
> And call this variant: yarcu (Yet Another RCU) (pronounced yar-ku ?)
I was thinking in terms of rcu_read_lock_trace(), but hey!
Thanx, Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists