linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1] dt-bindings: display: rockchip: convert rockchip vop bindings to yaml

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <590762ab-db79-c8b1-7f0e-b653ed4b1721@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 9 Mar 2020 07:55:22 +0100
From:   Johan Jonker <jbx6244@...il.com>
To:     jbx6244@...il.com
Cc:     airlied@...ux.ie, daniel@...ll.ch, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, heiko@...ech.de,
        hjc@...k-chips.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
        robh+dt@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] dt-bindings: display: rockchip: convert rockchip vop
 bindings to yaml

Hi,

Question for robh:

In the old txt situation we add/describe only properties that are used
by the driver/hardware itself. With yaml it also filters things in a
node that are used by other drivers like:

assigned-clocks:
assigned-clock-rates:
power-domains:

Should we add or not?

Kind regards,

Johan

PS: Will drop 'rockchip,grf' in v2 for px30, not used in vop driver?