linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1] dt-bindings: display: rockchip: convert rockchip vop bindings to yaml

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200323193601.GC8470@bogus>
Date:   Mon, 23 Mar 2020 13:36:01 -0600
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     Johan Jonker <jbx6244@...il.com>
Cc:     airlied@...ux.ie, daniel@...ll.ch, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, heiko@...ech.de,
        hjc@...k-chips.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] dt-bindings: display: rockchip: convert rockchip vop
 bindings to yaml

On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 07:55:22AM +0100, Johan Jonker wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Question for robh:
> 
> In the old txt situation we add/describe only properties that are used
> by the driver/hardware itself. With yaml it also filters things in a
> node that are used by other drivers like:
> 
> assigned-clocks:
> assigned-clock-rates:
> power-domains:
> 
> Should we add or not?

Yes, only pinctrl properties are automatically added.

We could change 'assigned-clocks', but for now I think they should be 
added.

Rob