[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200310171403.GL4106@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 17:14:03 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
Cc: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org,
Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: spi-fsl-dspi: fix DMA mapping
On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 03:12:45PM +0100, Michael Walle wrote:
> Am 2020-03-10 14:02, schrieb Vladimir Oltean:
> > I'm testing LS1028A with IOMMU_DEFAULT_PASSTHROUGH=y and I didn't have
> > time to change my setup now. I've also sent a v3 to my patch series
> > which is going to conflict with this one, sorry.
> No worries, its easy enough to rebase.
> > I would have picked
> > your patch up with my series but I didn't have the right environment
> > to test it.
> I'll resend a v2 once your series is working.
Since it looks like your series might need another spin anyway I'm
thinking it's sensible to apply this now and you rebase instead? Cuts
down on the number of pending patches if nothing else (unless the
testing stuff gets sorted out of course).
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists