[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+h21hqLxMREixud3Mh8p4q6J7rvJzRH+aFVgYLTZ9aNmkZBww@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 19:26:41 +0200
From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org,
Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: spi-fsl-dspi: fix DMA mapping
On Tue, 10 Mar 2020 at 19:14, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 03:12:45PM +0100, Michael Walle wrote:
> > Am 2020-03-10 14:02, schrieb Vladimir Oltean:
>
> > > I'm testing LS1028A with IOMMU_DEFAULT_PASSTHROUGH=y and I didn't have
> > > time to change my setup now. I've also sent a v3 to my patch series
> > > which is going to conflict with this one, sorry.
>
> > No worries, its easy enough to rebase.
>
> > > I would have picked
> > > your patch up with my series but I didn't have the right environment
> > > to test it.
>
> > I'll resend a v2 once your series is working.
>
> Since it looks like your series might need another spin anyway I'm
> thinking it's sensible to apply this now and you rebase instead? Cuts
> down on the number of pending patches if nothing else (unless the
> testing stuff gets sorted out of course).
Sure, go ahead.
Thanks,
-Vladimir
Powered by blists - more mailing lists