[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJfpegu5HMg2BnBsfSEWOv7K_0KjchntZ9q4oOvxzYLjOEBF3g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 20:31:44 +0100
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org, virtio-fs@...hat.com,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@...hat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/20] fuse: implement FUSE_INIT map_alignment field
On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 5:59 PM Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> The device communicates FUSE_SETUPMAPPING/FUSE_REMOVMAPPING alignment
> constraints via the FUST_INIT map_alignment field. Parse this field and
> ensure our DAX mappings meet the alignment constraints.
>
> We don't actually align anything differently since our mappings are
> already 2MB aligned. Just check the value when the connection is
> established. If it becomes necessary to honor arbitrary alignments in
> the future we'll have to adjust how mappings are sized.
>
> The upshot of this commit is that we can be confident that mappings will
> work even when emulating x86 on Power and similar combinations where the
> host page sizes are different.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...hat.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists