linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: serial: snps-dw-apb-uart: add compatible property for rk3308 uart

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200310193253.GA23246@bogus>
Date:   Tue, 10 Mar 2020 14:32:53 -0500
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     Johan Jonker <jbx6244@...il.com>
Cc:     heiko@...ech.de, robh+dt@...nel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: serial: snps-dw-apb-uart: add compatible
 property for rk3308 uart

On Mon,  2 Mar 2020 14:39:10 +0100, Johan Jonker wrote:
> A test with the command below gives these errors:
> 
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3308-evb.dt.yaml: serial@...d0000: compatible:
> ['rockchip,rk3308-uart', 'snps,dw-apb-uart']
> is not valid under any of the given schemas
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3308-roc-cc.dt.yaml: serial@...a0000: compatible:
> ['rockchip,rk3308-uart', 'snps,dw-apb-uart']
> is not valid under any of the given schemas
> 
> The compatible property for the Rockchip rk3308 uart was somehow never
> added to the documention. Fix this error by adding 'rockchip,rk3308-uart'
> to snps-dw-apb-uart.yaml.
> 
> make ARCH=arm64 dtbs_check
> DT_SCHEMA_FILES=Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/
> snps-dw-apb-uart.yaml
> 
> Signed-off-by: Johan Jonker <jbx6244@...il.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/snps-dw-apb-uart.yaml | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 

Applied, thanks.

Rob