linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] mtd: spi-nor: remove mtk-quadspi driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2471214.x7VzW1FXlQ@localhost.localdomain>
Date:   Tue, 10 Mar 2020 07:41:26 +0000
From:   <Tudor.Ambarus@...rochip.com>
To:     <broonie@...nel.org>
CC:     <gch981213@...il.com>, <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
        <richard@....at>, <vigneshr@...com>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        <matthias.bgg@...il.com>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] mtd: spi-nor: remove mtk-quadspi driver

Hi, Mark,

On Monday, March 9, 2020 2:10:20 PM EET Mark Brown wrote:
> > This driver is superseded by the new spi-mtk-nor driver.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Chuanhong Guo <gch981213@...il.com>
> 
> Is this move OK from a MTD point of view - should I apply this when the
> rest goes in?  The patch was in prior versions too and is obviously
> straightforward.

If you find the rest of the patches ok, this can go through the spi tree, feel 
free to add my
Acked-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...rochip.com>

There will be a conflict with the following patch https://
patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1247791/, but nothing that we can't handle.
I'll try to allocate time for reviewing the remaining patches in this set in 
the following days.

Cheers,
ta