linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] mtd: spi-nor: remove mtk-quadspi driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 10 Mar 2020 09:11:29 +0000
From:   <Tudor.Ambarus@...rochip.com>
To:     <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>
CC:     <broonie@...nel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <vigneshr@...com>, <richard@....at>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
        <robh+dt@...nel.org>, <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>, <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        <gch981213@...il.com>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] mtd: spi-nor: remove mtk-quadspi driver

On Tuesday, March 10, 2020 9:41:26 AM EET Tudor.Ambarus@...rochip.com wrote:
> Hi, Mark,
> 
> On Monday, March 9, 2020 2:10:20 PM EET Mark Brown wrote:
> > > This driver is superseded by the new spi-mtk-nor driver.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Chuanhong Guo <gch981213@...il.com>
> > 
> > Is this move OK from a MTD point of view - should I apply this when the
> > rest goes in?  The patch was in prior versions too and is obviously
> > straightforward.
> 
> If you find the rest of the patches ok, this can go through the spi tree,
> feel free to add my
> Acked-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...rochip.com>
> 
> There will be a conflict with the following patch https://
> patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1247791/, but nothing that we can't handle.

You can also create an immutable tag that I can merge in my spi-nor/next 
branch, so that Linus doesn't have to deal with the conflict.

ta