| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20200310094143.GB30868@yilunxu-OptiPlex-7050>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 17:41:43 +0800
From: Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@...el.com>
To: Wu Hao <hao.wu@...el.com>
Cc: mdf@...nel.org, linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Luwei Kang <luwei.kang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] fpga: dfl: pci: add irq info for feature devices
enumeration
On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 10:46:26AM +0800, Wu Hao wrote:
> Hi Yilun
>
> Some comments inline. : )
>
> On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 06:29:45PM +0800, Xu Yilun wrote:
> > Some DFL FPGA PCIe cards (e.g. Intel FPGA Programmable Acceleration
> > Card) support MSI-X based interrupts. This patch allows PCIe driver
> > to prepare and pass interrupt resources to DFL via enumeration API.
> > These interrupt resources could then be assigned to actual features
> > which use them.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Luwei Kang <luwei.kang@...el.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Wu Hao <hao.wu@...el.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@...el.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/fpga/dfl-pci.c | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> > 1 file changed, 61 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/fpga/dfl-pci.c b/drivers/fpga/dfl-pci.c
> > index 5387550..a3370e5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/fpga/dfl-pci.c
> > +++ b/drivers/fpga/dfl-pci.c
> > @@ -80,8 +80,23 @@ static void cci_remove_feature_devs(struct pci_dev *pcidev)
> > dfl_fpga_feature_devs_remove(drvdata->cdev);
> > }
> >
> > +static int *cci_pci_create_irq_table(struct pci_dev *pcidev, unsigned int nvec)
> > +{
> > + int *table, i;
> > +
> > + table = kcalloc(nvec, sizeof(int), GFP_KERNEL);
>
> Maybe devm_ version is better?
This table will be freed right after dfl_fpga_enum_info_add_irq(). Maybe
don't need devm_ version.
>
> > + if (!table)
> > + return NULL;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < nvec; i++)
>
> i should be unsigned int as well?
Yes I should change it.
>
> > + table[i] = pci_irq_vector(pcidev, i);
> > +
> > + return table;
> > +}
> > +
> > /* enumerate feature devices under pci device */
> > -static int cci_enumerate_feature_devs(struct pci_dev *pcidev)
> > +static int cci_enumerate_feature_devs(struct pci_dev *pcidev,
> > + unsigned int nvec)
> > {
> > struct cci_drvdata *drvdata = pci_get_drvdata(pcidev);
> > struct dfl_fpga_enum_info *info;
> > @@ -89,6 +104,7 @@ static int cci_enumerate_feature_devs(struct pci_dev *pcidev)
> > resource_size_t start, len;
> > int port_num, bar, i, ret = 0;
> > void __iomem *base;
> > + int *irq_table;
> > u32 offset;
> > u64 v;
> >
> > @@ -97,6 +113,18 @@ static int cci_enumerate_feature_devs(struct pci_dev *pcidev)
> > if (!info)
> > return -ENOMEM;
> >
> > + /* add irq info for enumeration if really needed */
> > + if (nvec) {
> > + irq_table = cci_pci_create_irq_table(pcidev, nvec);
> > + if (irq_table) {
> > + dfl_fpga_enum_info_add_irq(info, nvec, irq_table);
> > + kfree(irq_table);
> > + } else {
> > + ret = -ENOMEM;
> > + goto enum_info_free_exit;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > /* start to find Device Feature List from Bar 0 */
> > base = cci_pci_ioremap_bar(pcidev, 0);
> > if (!base) {
> > @@ -173,6 +201,28 @@ static int cci_enumerate_feature_devs(struct pci_dev *pcidev)
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > +static int cci_pci_alloc_irq(struct pci_dev *pcidev)
> > +{
> > + int nvec = pci_msix_vec_count(pcidev);
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + if (nvec <= 0) {
> > + dev_dbg(&pcidev->dev, "fpga interrupt not supported\n");
> > + return 0;
> > + }
> > +
> > + ret = pci_alloc_irq_vectors(pcidev, nvec, nvec, PCI_IRQ_MSIX);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + return nvec;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void cci_pci_free_irq(struct pci_dev *pcidev)
> > +{
> > + pci_free_irq_vectors(pcidev);
> > +}
> > +
> > static
> > int cci_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pcidev, const struct pci_device_id *pcidevid)
> > {
> > @@ -210,14 +260,19 @@ int cci_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pcidev, const struct pci_device_id *pcidevid)
> > goto disable_error_report_exit;
> > }
> >
> > - ret = cci_enumerate_feature_devs(pcidev);
> > - if (ret) {
> > - dev_err(&pcidev->dev, "enumeration failure %d.\n", ret);
> > + ret = cci_pci_alloc_irq(pcidev);
> > + if (ret < 0) {
> > + dev_err(&pcidev->dev, "Fail to alloc irq %d.\n", ret);
>
> we prepare mmio resources in side cci_enumerate_feature_devs.
>
> maybe we could put irq resources code in side cce_enumerate_feature_devs too?
Yes I will try to change it in patch v2.
Thanks for your quick response.
>
>
> Thanks
> Hao
>
> > goto disable_error_report_exit;
> > }
> >
> > - return ret;
> > + ret = cci_enumerate_feature_devs(pcidev, (unsigned int)ret);
> > + if (!ret)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + dev_err(&pcidev->dev, "enumeration failure %d.\n", ret);
> >
> > + cci_pci_free_irq(pcidev);
> > disable_error_report_exit:
> > pci_disable_pcie_error_reporting(pcidev);
> > return ret;
> > @@ -263,6 +318,7 @@ static void cci_pci_remove(struct pci_dev *pcidev)
> > cci_pci_sriov_configure(pcidev, 0);
> >
> > cci_remove_feature_devs(pcidev);
> > + cci_pci_free_irq(pcidev);
> > pci_disable_pcie_error_reporting(pcidev);
> > }
> >
> > --
> > 2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists