linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.19 84/86] efi/x86: Handle by-ref arguments covering multiple pages in mixed mode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200311132845.GA24349@duo.ucw.cz>
Date:   Wed, 11 Mar 2020 14:28:45 +0100
From:   Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 84/86] efi/x86: Handle by-ref arguments covering
 multiple pages in mixed mode

On Wed 2020-03-11 14:13:11, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 02:01:07PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> > 
> > > Currently, the mixed mode runtime service wrappers require that all by-ref
> > > arguments that live in the vmalloc space have a size that is a power of 2,
> > > and are aligned to that same value. While this is a sensible way to
> > > construct an object that is guaranteed not to cross a page boundary, it is
> > > overly strict when it comes to checking whether a given object violates
> > > this requirement, as we can simply take the physical address of the first
> > > and the last byte, and verify that they point into the same physical
> > > page.
> > 
> > Dunno. If start passing buffers that _sometime_ cross page boundaries,
> > we'll get hard to debug failures. Maybe original code is better
> > buecause it catches problems earlier?
> > 
> > Furthermore, all existing code should pass aligned, 2^n size buffers,
> > so we should not need this in stable?
> 
> For some crazy reason you cut out the reason I applied this patch to the
> stable tree.  From the changelog text:
> 	Fixes: f6697df36bdf0bf7 ("x86/efi: Prevent mixed mode boot
>corruption with CONFIG_VMAP_STACK=y")

I did not notice that, but reviewing f669 does not really help. If
there is some known code that passes unaligned (but guaranteed
not-to-cross-page) buffers here, then yes, but is it? Having
not-page-crossing guarantees is kind of hard without alignment.

People seem to be adding Fixes: tags even if it is not a bugfix, just
as reminder that this has relation to some other commit...

Best regards,
								Pavel


-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,      Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (196 bytes)