[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4aadd119d4336de9eafcfbadb951630eb0cf2eb9.camel@perches.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 21:42:17 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Scott Branden <scott.branden@...adcom.com>,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: always allow C99 SPDX License Identifer
comments
On Wed, 2020-03-11 at 19:48 -0700, Scott Branden wrote:
> Hi Joe,
>
> On 2020-03-11 7:26 p.m., Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Wed, 2020-03-11 at 12:11 -0700, Scott Branden wrote:
> > > Always allow C99 comment styles if SPDK-License-Identifier is in comment
> > > even if C99_COMMENT_TOLERANCE is specified in the --ignore options.
> > Why is this useful?
> This is useful because if you run checkpatch with
> --ignore=C99_COMMENT_TOLERANCE
> right now it will warn on almost every .c file in the linux kernel due
> to the decision to
> use // SPDX-License-Identifier: at the start of every c file
Maybe this is better:
Just don't perform any other per-line checks on a valid or invalid
SPDX line.
---
scripts/checkpatch.pl | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
index 529c892..3f2ae7 100755
--- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
+++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
@@ -3171,6 +3171,7 @@ sub process {
WARN("SPDX_LICENSE_TAG",
"'$spdx_license' is not supported in LICENSES/...\n" . $herecurr);
}
+ next;
}
}
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists