[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bd35c17d-8766-cba5-09b3-87970de4c731@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 14:41:07 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Daniel Colascione <dancol@...gle.com>,
"Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: interaction of MADV_PAGEOUT with CoW anonymous mappings?
One other fun thing. I have a "victim" thread sitting in a loop doing:
sleep(1)
memcpy(&garbage, buffer, sz);
The "attacker" is doing
madvise(buffer, sz, MADV_PAGEOUT);
in a loop. That, oddly enough doesn't cause the victim to page fault.
But, if I do:
memcpy(&garbage, buffer, sz);
madvise(buffer, sz, MADV_PAGEOUT);
It *does* cause the memory to get paged out. The MADV_PAGEOUT code
actually has a !pte_present() check. It will punt on a PTE if it sees
it. In other words, if a page is in the swap cache but not mapped by a
pte_present() PTE, MADV_PAGEOUT won't touch it.
Shouldn't MADV_PAGEOUT be able to find and reclaim those pages? Patch
attached.
View attachment "madv-pageout-find-swap-cache.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (1630 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists