Date:   Thu, 12 Mar 2020 22:41:36 +0100
From:   Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To:     Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
Cc:     Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
        Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
        NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
        Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
        Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@...labora.com>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] media: i2c: ov5645: Switch to assigned-clock-rates

Hi Prabhakar,

On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 10:13 PM Lad Prabhakar
<prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com> wrote:
> This patch switches to assigned-clock-rates for specifying the clock rate.
> The clk-conf.c internally handles setting the clock rate when
> assigned-clock-rates is passed.
>
> The driver now sets the clock frequency only if the deprecated property
> clock-frequency is defined instead assigned-clock-rates, this is to avoid
> breakage with existing DT binaries.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>

Thanks for your patch!

> --- a/drivers/media/i2c/ov5645.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/ov5645.c
> @@ -1055,6 +1055,7 @@ static int ov5645_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
>         struct device_node *endpoint;
>         struct ov5645 *ov5645;
>         u8 chip_id_high, chip_id_low;
> +       bool set_clk = false;
>         unsigned int i;
>         u32 xclk_freq;
>         int ret;
> @@ -1094,10 +1095,17 @@ static int ov5645_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
>                 return PTR_ERR(ov5645->xclk);
>         }
>
> -       ret = of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, "clock-frequency", &xclk_freq);
> +       ret = of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, "assigned-clock-rates",
> +                                  &xclk_freq);
>         if (ret) {

I think you can just leave out the above check...

> -               dev_err(dev, "could not get xclk frequency\n");
> -               return ret;
> +               /* check if deprecated property clock-frequency is defined */
> +               ret = of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, "clock-frequency",
> +                                          &xclk_freq);
> +               if (ret) {

... and ignore the absence of the deprecated property.

> +                       dev_err(dev, "could not get xclk frequency\n");
> +                       return ret;
> +               }
> +               set_clk = true;

I.e. just

        /* check if deprecated property clock-frequency is defined */
        xclk_freq = 0;
        of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, "clock-frequency", &xclk_freq);
        if (xclk_freq) {
                ret = clk_set_rate(ov5645->xclk, xclk_freq);
                if (ret) {
                        dev_err(dev, "could not set xclk frequency\n");
                        return ret;
                }
        } else {
                xclk_freq = clk_get_rate(ov5645->xclk, xclk_freq);
        }

>         }
>
>         /* external clock must be 24MHz, allow 1% tolerance */
> @@ -1107,10 +1115,12 @@ static int ov5645_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
>                 return -EINVAL;
>         }
>
> -       ret = clk_set_rate(ov5645->xclk, xclk_freq);
> -       if (ret) {
> -               dev_err(dev, "could not set xclk frequency\n");
> -               return ret;
> +       if (set_clk) {
> +               ret = clk_set_rate(ov5645->xclk, xclk_freq);
> +               if (ret) {
> +                       dev_err(dev, "could not set xclk frequency\n");
> +                       return ret;
> +               }

>         }
>
>         for (i = 0; i < OV5645_NUM_SUPPLIES; i++)
> --
> 2.7.4
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel



-- 
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

Powered by blists - more mailing lists