[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <158405507267.149997.9253782069794352377@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 16:17:52 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To: Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>, Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>,
Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@...e.de>
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@...pberrypi.com>,
Tim Gover <tim.gover@...pberrypi.com>,
Phil Elwell <phil@...pberrypi.com>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/89] clk: bcm: rpi: Use clk_hw_register for pllb_arm
Quoting Maxime Ripard (2020-02-24 01:06:11)
> The pllb_arm clock is defined as a fixed factor clock with the pllb clock
> as a parent. However, all its configuration is entirely static, and thus we
> don't really need to call clk_hw_register_fixed_factor but can simply call
> clk_hw_register with a static clk_fixed_factor structure.
Please add () to things like clk_hw_register_fixed_factor() and
clk_hw_register().
>
> Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>
> Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
> Cc: linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists