[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <158405524157.149997.3910944815982950564@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date:   Thu, 12 Mar 2020 16:20:41 -0700
From:   Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To:     Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>, Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>,
        Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@...e.de>
Cc:     dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@...pberrypi.com>,
        Tim Gover <tim.gover@...pberrypi.com>,
        Phil Elwell <phil@...pberrypi.com>,
        Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/89] clk: bcm: rpi: Make sure pllb_arm is removed
Quoting Maxime Ripard (2020-02-24 01:06:13)
> The pllb_arm clock was created at probe time, but was never removed if
> something went wrong later in probe, or if the driver was ever removed from
> the system.
> 
> Now that we are using clk_hw_register, we can just use its managed variant
> to take care of that for us.
> 
> Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>
> Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
> Cc: linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists