linux-kernel - Re: [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH v2] Staging: rtl8723bs: rtw

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <25a1aca2c993ecb70ba7cd9c9e38bce9170a98b0.camel@perches.com>
Date:   Fri, 13 Mar 2020 14:21:57 -0700
From:   Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:     Shreeya Patel <shreeya.patel23498@...il.com>,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, outreachy-kernel@...glegroups.com,
        sbrivio@...hat.com, daniel.baluta@...il.com,
        nramas@...ux.microsoft.com, hverkuil@...all.nl,
        Larry.Finger@...inger.net
Subject: Re: [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH v2] Staging: rtl8723bs: rtw_mlme:
 Remove unnecessary conditions

On Fri, 2020-03-13 at 15:59 +0530, Shreeya Patel wrote:
> Remove unnecessary if and else conditions since both are leading to the
> initialization of "phtpriv->ampdu_enable" with the same value.
> Also, remove the unnecessary else-if condition since it does nothing.
[]
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme.c
[]
> @@ -2772,16 +2772,7 @@ void rtw_update_ht_cap(struct adapter *padapter, u8 *pie, uint ie_len, u8 channe
>  
>  	/* maybe needs check if ap supports rx ampdu. */
>  	if (!(phtpriv->ampdu_enable) && pregistrypriv->ampdu_enable == 1) {
> -		if (pregistrypriv->wifi_spec == 1) {
> -			/* remove this part because testbed AP should disable RX AMPDU */
> -			/* phtpriv->ampdu_enable = false; */
> -			phtpriv->ampdu_enable = true;
> -		} else {
> -			phtpriv->ampdu_enable = true;
> -		}
> -	} else if (pregistrypriv->ampdu_enable == 2) {
> -		/* remove this part because testbed AP should disable RX AMPDU */
> -		/* phtpriv->ampdu_enable = true; */
> +		phtpriv->ampdu_enable = true;

This isn't the same test.

This could be:
 	if ((!(phtpriv->ampdu_enable) && pregistrypriv->ampdu_enable == 1)) ||
	    pregistrypriv->ampdu_enable == 2)
		phtpriv->ampdu_enable = true;

Though it is probably more sensible to just set
phtpriv->ampdu_enable without testing whether or
not it's already set:

	if (pregistrypriv->ampdu_enable == 1 ||
	    pregistrypriv->ampdu_enable == 2)
		phtpriv->ampdu_enable = true;