linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4] Documentation: kunit: Make the KUnit documentation less UML-specific

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 13 Mar 2020 16:36:21 -0700
From:   Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>
To:     shuah <shuah@...nel.org>
Cc:     Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
        David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>,
        Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        KUnit Development <kunit-dev@...glegroups.com>,
        "open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" 
        <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Bird, Timothy" <Tim.Bird@...y.com>,
        Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@...y.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] Documentation: kunit: Make the KUnit documentation
 less UML-specific

On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 9:05 AM shuah <shuah@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On 3/2/20 9:50 AM, Frank Rowand wrote:
> > Hi David,
> >
> > On 2/28/20 1:18 PM, David Gow wrote:
> >> Remove some of the outmoded "Why KUnit" rationale, and move some
> >> UML-specific information to the kunit_tool page. Also update the Getting
> >> Started guide to mention running tests without the kunit_tool wrapper.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
> >> Reviewed-by: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@...y.com>
> >> ---
> >> Sorry: I missed a couple of issues in the last version. They're fixed
> >> here, and I think this should be ready to go.
> >>
> >> Changelog:
> >>
> >> v4:
> >> - Fix typo: s/offsers/offers
> >> - Talk about KUnit tests running on most "architectures" instead of
> >>    "kernel configurations.
> >> v3:
> >> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20200214235723.254228-1-davidgow@google.com/T/#u
> >> - Added a note that KUnit can be used with UML, both with and without
> >>    kunit_tool to replace the section moved to kunit_tool.
> >> v2:
> >> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/f99a3d4d-ad65-5fd1-3407-db33f378b1fa@gmail.com/T/
> >> - Reinstated the "Why Kunit?" section, minus the comparison with other
> >>    testing frameworks (covered in the FAQ), and the description of UML.
> >> - Moved the description of UML into to kunit_tool page.
> >> - Tidied up the wording around how KUnit is built and run to make it
> >>    work
> >>    without the UML description.
> >> v1:
> >> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/9c703dea-a9e1-94e2-c12d-3cb0a09e75ac@gmail.com/T/
> >> - Initial patch
> >
> > Thanks for all the changes.  The documents are now much more understandable
> > and useful.
> >
>
> Is this ready to go? If it goes through doc tree:
>
> Acked-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
>
> Otherwise, I can pic it up.

Yep, looks good to me.