linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4] Documentation: kunit: Make the KUnit documentation less UML-specific

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 13 Mar 2020 16:35:56 -0700
From:   Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>
To:     David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
Cc:     Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        KUnit Development <kunit-dev@...glegroups.com>,
        "open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" 
        <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
        "Bird, Timothy" <Tim.Bird@...y.com>,
        Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@...y.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] Documentation: kunit: Make the KUnit documentation
 less UML-specific

On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 11:18 AM David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> Remove some of the outmoded "Why KUnit" rationale, and move some
> UML-specific information to the kunit_tool page. Also update the Getting
> Started guide to mention running tests without the kunit_tool wrapper.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
> Reviewed-by: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@...y.com>

Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>