| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 09:09:04 +0100
From: Amadeusz Sławiński
<amadeuszx.slawinski@...ux.intel.com>
To: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Cc: Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@...el.com>, tiwai@...e.de,
Jie Yang <yang.jie@...ux.intel.com>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
Mac Chiang <mac.chiang@...el.com>,
srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org, jank@...ence.com,
Amery Song <chao.song@...el.com>,
Bard liao <yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com>,
Pan Xiuli <xiuli.pan@...ux.intel.com>,
Hui Wang <hui.wang@...onical.com>,
Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@...ux.intel.com>,
Rander Wang <rander.wang@...ux.intel.com>,
slawomir.blauciak@...el.com, broonie@...nel.org,
Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>,
Sathyanarayana Nujella <sathyanarayana.nujella@...el.com>,
Naveen Manohar <naveen.m@...el.com>,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, vkoul@...nel.org,
Sathya Prakash M R <sathya.prakash.m.r@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] ASoC: soc-acpi: expand description of _ADR-based
devices
On 3/12/2020 8:33 PM, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> For SoundWire, we need to know if endpoints needs to be 'aggregated'
> (MIPI parlance, meaning logically grouped), e.g. when two speaker
> amplifiers need to be handled as a single logical output.
>
> We don't necessarily have the information at the firmware (BIOS)
> level, so add a notion of endpoints and specify if a device/endpoint
> is part of a group, with a position.
>
> This may be expanded in future solutions, for now only provide a group
> and position information.
>
> Since we modify the header file, change all existing upstream tables
> as well to avoid breaking compilation/bisect.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> include/sound/soc-acpi.h | 39 ++++++--
> .../intel/common/soc-acpi-intel-cml-match.c | 87 +++++++++++++----
> .../intel/common/soc-acpi-intel-icl-match.c | 97 +++++++++++++++----
> .../intel/common/soc-acpi-intel-tgl-match.c | 49 ++++++++--
> 4 files changed, 221 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)
>
(...)
> diff --git a/sound/soc/intel/common/soc-acpi-intel-icl-match.c b/sound/soc/intel/common/soc-acpi-intel-icl-match.c
> index 752733013d54..36e2d09cf58c 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/intel/common/soc-acpi-intel-icl-match.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/intel/common/soc-acpi-intel-icl-match.c
> @@ -33,55 +33,112 @@ struct snd_soc_acpi_mach snd_soc_acpi_intel_icl_machines[] = {
> };
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(snd_soc_acpi_intel_icl_machines);
>
> -static const u64 rt700_0_adr[] = {
> - 0x000010025D070000
> +static const struct snd_soc_acpi_endpoint single_endpoint = {
> + .num = 0,
> + .aggregated = 0,
> + .group_position = 0,
> + .group_id = 0,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct snd_soc_acpi_endpoint spk_l_endpoint = {
> + .num = 0,
> + .aggregated = 1,
> + .group_position = 0,
> + .group_id = 1,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct snd_soc_acpi_endpoint spk_r_endpoint = {
> + .num = 0,
> + .aggregated = 1,
> + .group_position = 1,
> + .group_id = 1,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct snd_soc_acpi_adr_device rt700_0_adr[] = {
> + {
> + .adr = 0x000010025D070000,
> + .num_endpoints = 1,
> + .endpoints = &single_endpoint,
> + }
> };
>
> static const struct snd_soc_acpi_link_adr icl_rvp[] = {
> {
> .mask = BIT(0),
> .num_adr = ARRAY_SIZE(rt700_0_adr),
> - .adr = rt700_0_adr,
> + .adr_d = rt700_0_adr,
> },
> {}
> };
>
> -static const u64 rt711_0_adr[] = {
> - 0x000010025D071100
> +static const struct snd_soc_acpi_adr_device rt711_0_adr[] = {
> + {
> + .adr = 0x000010025D071100,
> + .num_endpoints = 1,
> + .endpoints = &single_endpoint,
> + }
> +};
> +
> +static const struct snd_soc_acpi_adr_device rt1308_1_adr[] = {
> + {
> + .adr = 0x000110025D130800,
> + .num_endpoints = 1,
> + .endpoints = &single_endpoint,
> + }
> };
>
> -static const u64 rt1308_1_adr[] = {
> - 0x000110025D130800
> +static const struct snd_soc_acpi_adr_device rt1308_2_adr[] = {
> + {
> + .adr = 0x000210025D130800,
> + .num_endpoints = 1,
> + .endpoints = &single_endpoint,
> + }
> };
>
> -static const u64 rt1308_2_adr[] = {
> - 0x000210025D130800
> +static const struct snd_soc_acpi_adr_device rt1308_1_group1_adr[] = {
> + {
> + .adr = 0x000110025D130800,
> + .num_endpoints = 1,
> + .endpoints = &spk_l_endpoint,
> + }
> };
>
> -static const u64 rt715_3_adr[] = {
> - 0x000310025D071500
> +static const struct snd_soc_acpi_adr_device rt1308_2_group1_adr[] = {
> + {
> + .adr = 0x000210025D130800,
> + .num_endpoints = 1,
> + .endpoints = &spk_r_endpoint,
> + }
> +};
> +
> +static const struct snd_soc_acpi_adr_device rt715_3_adr[] = {
> + {
> + .adr = 0x000310025D071500,
> + .num_endpoints = 1,
> + .endpoints = &single_endpoint,
> + }
> };
>
> static const struct snd_soc_acpi_link_adr icl_3_in_1_default[] = {
> {
> .mask = BIT(0),
> .num_adr = ARRAY_SIZE(rt711_0_adr),
> - .adr = rt711_0_adr,
> + .adr_d = rt711_0_adr,
> },
> {
> .mask = BIT(1),
> - .num_adr = ARRAY_SIZE(rt1308_1_adr),
> - .adr = rt1308_1_adr,
> + .num_adr = ARRAY_SIZE(rt1308_1_group1_adr),
> + .adr_d = rt1308_1_adr,
Is this right, you use different struct in ARRAY_SIZE and assignment?
> },
> {
> .mask = BIT(2),
> - .num_adr = ARRAY_SIZE(rt1308_2_adr),
> - .adr = rt1308_2_adr,
> + .num_adr = ARRAY_SIZE(rt1308_2_group1_adr),
> + .adr_d = rt1308_2_adr,
Same here.
> },
> {
> .mask = BIT(3),
> .num_adr = ARRAY_SIZE(rt715_3_adr),
> - .adr = rt715_3_adr,
> + .adr_d = rt715_3_adr,
> },
> {}
> };
> @@ -90,17 +147,17 @@ static const struct snd_soc_acpi_link_adr icl_3_in_1_mono_amp[] = {
> {
> .mask = BIT(0),
> .num_adr = ARRAY_SIZE(rt711_0_adr),
> - .adr = rt711_0_adr,
> + .adr_d = rt711_0_adr,
> },
> {
> .mask = BIT(1),
> .num_adr = ARRAY_SIZE(rt1308_1_adr),
> - .adr = rt1308_1_adr,
> + .adr_d = rt1308_1_adr,
> },
> {
> .mask = BIT(3),
> .num_adr = ARRAY_SIZE(rt715_3_adr),
> - .adr = rt715_3_adr,
> + .adr_d = rt715_3_adr,
> },
> {}
> };
(...)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists